If you do not find an answer to your question below, click here to contact us.
The lawsuits that are being settled are entitled Heather Leslie v. Redstone Federal Credit Union, Case No. 5:20-CV-00629-LCB and Beverly Macon, et al. v. Redstone Federal Credit Union, Case No. 5:21-CV-01682-LCB, both are pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Each case is a “class action.” That means that the “Named Plaintiffs,” Tamela Hampton, Beverly Macon, and Savannah Garner, are acting on behalf of current and former members of Defendant who were assessed overdraft and nonsufficient funds (NSF) fees on certain transactions. The Named Plaintiffs have collectively asserted claims for breach of Defendant’s Account Agreement, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and violation of Regulation E of the Electronic Fund Transfers Act.
The Named Plaintiffs’ complaints are posted on this settlement website and contain all the claims asserted against Defendant. In the Leslie action, the Plaintiffs claim Defendant Redstone breached its own account agreement by assessing overdraft fees based on the available balance in member accounts. They also claim Redstone violated Regulation E of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act by assessing overdraft fees for debit card payments based on available balance in member accounts. In the Macon Action, Plaintiffs claim Redstone breached its own account agreement by charging overdraft and returned item (NSF) fees for overdraft check and ACH payments that were previously rejected due to insufficient funds.
Defendant does not deny that it charged the fees that the Named Plaintiffs are complaining about but contends that it did so properly and in accordance with the terms of its agreements and applicable law. Defendant therefore denies that its practices give rise to claims for damages by the Named Plaintiffs or any Class Member.
In any lawsuit, there are risks and potential benefits that come with a trial versus settling at an earlier stage. It is the Named Plaintiffs’ and their lawyers’ job to identify when a proposed settlement offer is good enough that it justifies recommending settling the case instead of continuing to trial. In a class action, the Named Plaintiffs’ lawyers, known as Class Counsel, make this recommendation to the Named Plaintiffs. The Named Plaintiffs have the duty to act in the best interests of the class as a whole and, in this case, it is their belief, as well as Class Counsels’ opinion, that this settlement is in the best interest of all Class Members.
There is legal uncertainty about whether a judge or a jury will find that Defendant was contractually and otherwise legally obligated not to assess the fees that are being challenged in this case. And even if it was contractually wrong to assess these fees, there is uncertainty about whether the Named Plaintiffs’ claims are subject to other defenses that might result in no or less recovery to Class Members. Even if the Named Plaintiffs were to win at trial, there is no assurance that the Class Members would be awarded more than the current settlement amount and it may take years of litigation before any payments would be made. By settling, the Class Members will avoid these, and other risks and the delays associated with continued litigation.
While Defendant disputes the allegations in the lawsuit and denies any liability or wrongdoing, it enters into the settlement solely to avoid the expense, inconvenience, and distraction of further proceedings in the litigation.
If you received a notice, then Defendant’s records indicate that you are a Class Member who is entitled to receive a payment or forgiveness of Uncollected Fees.
The deadline for sending a letter to exclude yourself from or opt out of the settlement is July 14, 2023.
The deadline to file an objection with the Court is also July 14, 2023.
If you believe the settlement is unreasonable, unfair, or inadequate and the Court should reject the settlement, you can object to the settlement terms. The Court will decide if your objection is valid. If the Court agrees, then the settlement will not be approved, and no payments will be made to you or any other Class Member. If your objection (and any other objection) is overruled, and the settlement is approved, then you will still get a payment or forgiveness of Uncollected Fees.
If you want to participate in the settlement, then you don’t have to do anything; you will receive a payment or forgiveness of Uncollected Fees if the settlement is approved by the Court.
As discussed separately below, attorneys’ fees, litigation costs, and the costs paid to a third-party Settlement Administrator to administer the settlement (including mailing and emailing this notice) will be paid out of the Settlement Fund. The balance of the Settlement Fund will be divided among all Class Members as described in the Settlement Agreement.
To opt out, you must send a letter to the Settlement Administrator that you want to be excluded. Your letter can simply say “I hereby elect to be excluded from the settlement in the Leslie v. Redstone and Macon v. Redstone class actions.” Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, and email address. Your exclusion or opt out request must be postmarked by July 14, 2023, and sent to:
Heather Leslie v. Redstone Federal Credit Union
- AND -
Beverly Macon, et al. v. Redstone Federal Credit Union
c/o Kroll Settlement Administration LLC
PO Box 225391
New York, NY 10150-5391
No. If you exclude yourself, you will not be entitled to a payment.
All objections must be post-marked no later than July 14, 2023, and must be mailed to the Settlement Administrator as follows:
Heather Leslie v. Redstone Federal Credit Union & Beverly Macon, et al. v. Redstone Federal Credit Union
c/o Kroll Settlement Administration LLC
PO Box 225391
New York, NY 10150-5391
Objecting is telling the Court that you do not believe the settlement or any part of it is fair, reasonable, and adequate for the class, and asking the Court to reject it. You can object only if you do not opt out of the settlement. Excluding yourself or opting out is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the settlement, and do not want to receive a payment or release claims you might have against Defendant as alleged in this lawsuit.